The list could go on but we’d quickly get bored of reading through it - as far as browser integrity check goes, it’s doing it’s job.Īs far as all of these patches to overwrite specific incompatibilities with a User-Agent string, I’d advise the maintainer to fix the issues at hand since these incompatibilities don’t spring out of nowhere - ESR 68.0 is extremely out of date and can’t be expected to work. Updated the useragent for to work around their “Only with Firefox” discrimination preventing users from downloading themes, old versions of extensions, and other files with Pale Moon. Updated the DropBox useragent override to solve login issues. Updated the WhatsApp Web site-specific user-agent override to respond to Google refusing access based on the old string. Improved reporting of the operating system in site-specific user-agent overrides.
Updated the included site-specific user-agent overrides for a number of websites that need them. Updated some site-specific user-agent overrides for web compatibility. Updated several site-specific user-agent overrides for web compatibility. One of the main points of the Browser Integrity Check is to prevent User-Agent spoofing, which the browser in question seems to be a big fan of. Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0 Win64 圆4 rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/4.8 Firefox/68.0 PaleMoon/29.4.6įirefox ESR 68.0 is more than End of Life and was superseded by ESR 78.0, which is also End of Life - only ESR 91.0 and beyond is actually supported nowadays.Ĭloudflare provide the tools to owners of websites - such as - and they won’t overrule a customer’s settings in any scenarios. However, I suspect that you won’t get the reply that you’re hoping for from them.
Pale moon standard download#
The latest ESR download from Firefox’s website supports these checks just fine and has no issues loading the website.
Wonder which three-letter agency they are also working for. Not even latest Firefox ESR (fork) is passing their “browser check”. If the vast majority of the web works fine but edge-case browsers that are intentionally not supporting the modern internet & using ancient browser bases don’t, I think it’s clear who the onus is on to fix that issue. The maintainer of the browser should reach out and see what part of the browser is failing the checks that every modern browser is handling just fine. Intentionally reducing the complexity of the Managed Challenges means making Cloudflare weaker against automated traffic, and that isn’t an objective they should pursue. This seems very much like an issue with the browser not keeping up-to-date with the way that the internet, and the vast majority of websites, are working nowadays. I’m not entirely sure I agree with your stance on this - at a glance, the User-Agent suggests that this browser is using a Firefox build from 2019 but from using it and what I can see on the release notes, there’s multiple updates in the past that fake the User-Agent or Firefox version to get around compatibility issues.
0 kommentar(er)
